Credit Scores and Credit Limit Changes

Credit scores are influenced and change up and down to a number of attributes found in an individual’s credit report.  The FICO credit score is the most common credit score used by lenders.  In calculating credit scores, the FICO score is derived by analyzing the data in an individual’s credit report and will change as the credit report data changes. 

A number of factors are weighed in a credit report to come up with the credit score.  Factors include length of credit, payment history, amounts owed, amount of new credit, types of credit used and other factors.

One of the other factors used to determine the credit score is the amount of available credit in relation to credit outstanding.  This is further analyzed by the proportion of credit lines used or the proportion of credit line balances such as credit card balances in relation to the total credit limits on certain types of revolving accounts.  The FICO score considers the consumer’s credit limit to evaluate what is referred to as the credit utilization rate or how much available credit is being used at the time the score is calculated.  The greater an individual’s credit utilization rate, the greater the risk that person will eventually default on a credit account.

Therefore it is reasonable to find two individuals that have fairly similar credit histories and payment patterns and one of these individuals has incurred a significant amount of credit card debt in relation to their available credit limits, while the other individual has relatively low credit card balances in relation to the available credit and the two scores will be different.  The individual with the greater amount of debt relative to available credit is penalized for that position.

The credit utilization rate factor that goes into credit score models is why the common advice on credit card for consumers is to avoid running up one credit card to its maximum limit, rather it is generally believed that to maintain or improve a credit score, the credit card balances should be spread out among different cards and therefore reduce the relative amount of debt to credit limit or credit utilization rate per credit card. 

With credit cards companies reducing their credit card exposure by dropping credit card limits on customer accounts, it is possible that these consumers are now finding their credit scores dropping as well.  In a recent FICO score study, the company found that that approximately 20 percent of the U.S. population experienced a reduction in total revolving credit between October 2008 and April 2009.  In general big reductions in credit limits will work the same as increases in the debt by reducing the amount of available credit and subsequently result in a negative impact on a credit score.

According to data from FICO score, the scores derived assess a lot of data and the effect of a single factor like a credit limit reduction on an individual credit score will depend on what other data is on the credit report and how much the credit card limit or line is reduced.

The key factors that impact the credit score in conjunction with a credit limit reduction, according to the folks at FICO score, include:  the amount by which their credit limit is reduced, what actions are taken by the consumers in reaction to the reduced credit limit, such as, late monthly payments, changes in the account balances, or opening a new accounts, as well as any other changes in the individuals credit report after the credit limit is reduced.

The negative impact of the reduced credit limit is therefore substantially mitigated by either positive steps of the consumer such as reducing credit balances or financial missteps such as late payments.  A credit limit reduction on a single credit card account won’t necessarily damage someone’s credit history or credit score.  The final impact will vary depending on each person’s unique credit profile.

Changes to Credit Score Calculations

In 2007 Fair Isaac Corporation, creators of the FICO credit scoring system announced that they would change how their credit score models evaluate credit report data.  The new credit score, referred to as FICO 08, was delayed in its implementation until the second half of 2009.

The FICO score model is kept under wraps by the company that created it, but it is always a good idea to obtain a general understanding as to what makes a good or bad credit score.  With the knowledge of what drives a credit score, consumers can either engage in good habits to maintain a good credit score or work to improve an existing low credit score.

The changes to the current FICO scores are taking place in a few key consumer sections that include opening new accounts or having prior derogatory information on select accounts and authorized user accounts.

The new version is less damaging for consumers that have had limited credit problems even in severe situations.  The score gives less weight to isolated problems as long as the majority of other active credit accounts are in good standing.

The new formula gives less weight to minor derogatory or negative accounts such as small collection accounts and public records in which the original debt was less than $100.

The new credit model also reduces the weight of authorized-user accounts by reducing the potential score impact associated with the abuse of authorized user accounts.

Adding a spouse or child to a credit card as an authorized user has long been a good way to improve that person’s credit score, since the good history already established on the account had generally been imported to the credit report of new authorized user.  Some mortgage brokers and credit repair companies began abusing this feature by “renting” authorized-user accounts from individuals that had good credit accounts and selling them to individuals who wanted to boost their scores.

According to company, they have developed technology that reduces any impact on the new credit score from intentional tampering, while allowing the scores of spouses and other genuine authorized users to benefit from their shared credit accounts.

The new credit score model uses the same 300-850scoring range, score reason codes, minimum scoring criteria, and inquiry treatment as previous versions of the score.

Credit bureau scores are often called FICO scores because most credit bureau scores used in the U.S. are produced from software developed by Fair Isaac and Company but not all credit scores are FICO scores.  FICO scores are provided to lenders by the major credit reporting agencies.  The FICO score is the credit risk score used by most lenders in the U.S.

Fed Announces Rule Changes for Marketing Free Credit Reports

The confusion over the marketing of free credit reports by companies that require a subscription to a credit monitoring service or other related products and services to receive the free credit report has resulted in intervention by the Federal Trade Commission. 

Numerous consumers have seen advertisements touting free credit reports.  Most of these advertisements have small disclaimer that explain that there is a requirement that the consumer sign up for a credit monitoring service or similar service that has a monthly charge in order to receive the free credit report(s).

The primary reason why there is a cost to the consumer over this confusion is that there has been no change regarding a consumer’s ability to receive a free credit report annually from each of the big three credit reporting agencies.  Federal law mandated that the big three credit reporting agencies make available one credit report per year, with the no-strings-attached. 

With the passage of the 2003 Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), all U.S consumers are entitled to one free credit report from each of the three major credit reporting agencies, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion upon request every 12 months.  The credit reports are available by mail or at AnnualCreditReport.com or by calling 877-322-8228.

A new rule established by the FTC is designed to restrict procedures and actions that might confuse or mislead consumers as they try to get their federally mandated free annual credit reports and end up paying for an unnecessary service.

The FTC press release regarding the new rule changes states that, starting April 1, advertising for “free credit reports” will require new disclosures to help consumers avoid confusing “free” offers – which often require consumers to spend money on credit monitoring or other products or services.

The Federal Trade Commission’s Free Credit Reports Rule will require prominent disclosures in advertisements for “free credit reports.”   The FTC example states that any Web site offering free credit reports must include a disclosure, across the top of each page that mentions free credit reports.  The notice will read:

THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY LAW.  Read more at FTC.GOV.
You have the right to a free credit report from AnnualCreditReport.com
or 877-322-8228, the ONLY authorized source under federal law.

The Web site must also include a link to AnnualCreditReport.com and FTC.GOV.

The amended rule established by the FTC becomes effective April 1, 2010, except in the case of television and radio advertisements, in which the new rules will take effect on September 1, 2010.

Using Secured Bank Loans to Improve a Credit Score

There are numerous tools that can be used to improve a damaged credit history and low credit score.  Along with removing any derogatory items that may be inaccurate in a credit report, the next best tactic is to add new credit and build a quick credit history.

There are several ways to add credit to a credit report.  Adding credit that helps improve a credit score can be a slow process, but a process that is generally necessary to rebuild credit profile that is the foundation of a good credit score and then make that credit appear to be a worthwhile credit risk for lenders and creditors in the future. 

Adding credit to a credit report can be a simple as obtaining a new car loan or credit card.  The unfortunate truth is that most consumers with a poor credit history and low credit score are not going to be granted a new car loan or credit card.

One method for acquiring new credit is to obtain a secured bank loan.  A bank loan typically carries a lot of weight with creditors and credit score models.  For those consumers that have the minimum financial resources to do so, a secured bank loan can provide a lift to a credit score that has been damaged by various delinquent creditor payments. 

To obtain a secure bank loan, the prospective borrower will need to take some money and open a savings account with a financial institution that provides loans on existing bank accounts.  Secure bank loans are generally found more often at small banks and credit unions as opposed to the larger financial institutions and national banks.  The most common type of secure bank loans are usually those executed with a loan against a savings account. 

A possible conflict with a credit union is that the smaller credit unions do not always report the payment and loan arrangement to the big three credit reporting agencies.  This factor is critical since the reason for the loan is to repair a poor credit profile with new credit and new credit history.  If a bank doesn’t report the payments to a credit bureau, it will defeat the purpose of obtaining the loan.

If the banks in the area do not offer these types of secured loans, another option is to see if the bank will provide an unsecured personal loan, a loan with a cosigner or a loan with another form of collateral to secure the loan.  In either of these cases, the end result is a new bank loan reflected in the credit report that will, hopefully, have a good payment history in the future to drive a credit score higher.

When applying for a secured loan make sure the bank or credit union does report to the credit bureaus, investigate the interest rate on the loans, the maximum amount that can be borrowed based on the security as well as the available repayment schedule.  Often, savings account loans have very desirable interest rates since the loan is 100% secured and easy to collect on by the bank.  And always be vigilant about the monthly loan payments, do not miss a loan payment and ruin the value of these loans.

Credit Repair Scams Halted by FTC

In October, 2008 the Federal Trade Commission sent out a press release regarding charges brought against another credit repair scam operation.  Credit report repair services that offer to repair credit for consumers have popped up across the nation.  Unfortunately, many of these organizations fail to help consumers and in some egregious cases, violate the law by taking money in advance and deceiving consumers regarding the services they perform to improve credit histories and credit scores.

In October, the FTC announced that two bogus credit repair companies and their principals settled Federal Trade Commission charges that they falsely claimed they could clean up consumers’ credit reports and collected up-front fees for their services, in violation of federal law.  In one case, the FTC alleged that the defendants marketed their services via Web sites and real estate investment seminars and falsely claimed that their special relationships with creditors, collection companies, public records providers and credit bureaus enabled them to remove derogatory information from consumers’ credit reports.

According to the FTC’s complaints, all of these defendants falsely promised to remove negative information from consumers’ credit reports, such as late payments, charge-offs, collections, tax liens, repossessions, bankruptcies, and judgments, even when the information was accurate and not obsolete, in violation of the FTC Act and the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA).  The Commission also charged them with violating the CROA by charging and collecting payment for their services before doing any work.

In the first case, Successful Credit Service Corporation, also doing business as Success Credit Services, and Tracy Ballard, also known as Tracy Ballard-Straughn, the settlement order prohibits them from collecting additional money from consumers who purchased their services before October 16, 2008, when the court halted their business practices.

The defendants in the second case are Rudolph Joseph Strobel, a/k/a Lee Harrison, and Leanna Ruth Harrison, both doing business as Lee Harrison Credit Restoration, Credit Restoration, and Lee Harrison Associates Credit Restoration.  The order bars them from collecting money from consumers who purchased their services before August 28, 2008, when the court halted their business practices, and requires them to return any money orders or other negotiable instruments received after that date.

Understanding your credit situation and the facts on how to clear up credit problems and improve a credit score is the first step to solving credit problems.  Rushing into a quick fix scheme can often lead to less than satisfactory results.  Know that facts before working with a credit repair organization to help your credit score.

More News on Spreading Credit Repair and Assistance Scams

Credit repair scams and mortgage assistance scams is growing problem for individual and the federal regulatory authorities.  The best way for individuals to tackle credit repair scams is to report misconduct including any promises or demands that are not legal credit repair practices to the appropriate authorities. 

The FTC enforces credit report and credit repair regulations but it does not investigate individual claims against a company, however they will investigate a company for legal violations.  The Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the FTC that a proceeding is in the public interest.

If any company charges for free credit evaluations or consultations, or charges for credit repair services that were never received, they should be reported so appropriate action can be taken to put an end to fraudulent and deceptive credit businesses.

In a recent press release by the FTC action was taken to stop the practices of a credit counseling business.  Crossland Credit Consulting Corp. and its co-defendants allegedly operated deceptive mortgage refinancing, credit repair, and loan modification schemes.

According to the FTC complaint, the company and defendants falsely promised to use proceeds from mortgage refinances to promptly pay off consumers’ original loans, but often pocketed the money instead.  They misrepresented that they would repair consumers’ credit records by removing truthful negative items from their credit reports so they could obtain mortgage loans, and charged advance fees for those services in violation of both the Credit Repair Organizations Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule.  They also falsely claimed that they would modify consumers’ mortgages to obtain substantially lower interest rates and monthly payments.  The court immediately barred the practices and froze the defendants’ assets pending a hearing.

Consumers should be careful when any company wants money up front for their services.  Credit repair scams have become recognized for their abusive practices in taking money up front from consumers with promises of credit report and credit score assistance and disappearing with the funds without improving the consumers credit history or credit score.  This problem now applies to mortgage assistance and foreclosure assistance services.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them.  In each case of wrongdoing, the FTC is asking the court to stop the defendants’ deceptive claims and make them forfeit their ill-gotten gains.

Another Debt Collection Scam Comes to an End

This is yet another news item on a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) regarding deceptive and or fraudulent collection practices by a debt collector.  This settlement from a debt collection agency was sizeable.  In this case, the settlement outcome included leaving the FTC with $1.6 million in recovered funds to distribute to thousands of consumers who were scammed into paying money they did not owe by con artists who threatened, harassed and lied to them.  Collection agencies may not harass consumers, lie, or use unfair practices when they try to collect a debt. 

Abusive collection actions are illegal, and if debt collectors use abusive tactics they could face legal action.  The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices as they may apply to debt collectors. 

According to an FTC press release, the FTC sued three companies, operating under the name National Check Control, charging them with harassing and abusing consumers, falsely threatening criminal prosecution, illegally communicating with third parties, collecting amounts that were not due, and other violations of federal laws.  In 2005, the court ordered a permanent halt to their operations and ordered them to pay redress to the consumers they had bilked.  The defendants in the case subsequently unsuccessfully appealed the case to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court.

On February 7, 2008, one day after the appeals court refused to reconsider his appeal, one of the defendants removed from a bank safe deposit box coins valued at $335,000 that the federal court had ordered to be turned over to the FTC for consumer redress.  A federal jury convicted him of two felony counts – theft of government property and obstruction of justice.  In October 2009, he was sentenced to 41 months in federal prison and is currently serving his sentence.

The FTC recovered a total of $1.6 million for consumer redress.  The funds will be distributed to 24,916 consumers who each lost $100 or more as the result of the defendants’ illegal actions.  The consumers have been identified based on records obtained in the case.  Consumers are scheduled to begin receiving checks in February 2010.

The Commission also has recently been taking more actions against the individuals, and not just the companies, responsible for illegal collection practices.

The FTC enforces illegal debt collection practices as well as those involving credit repair services and credit report issues.

No Credit or Credit Score Same as Bad Credit

Good credit and a good credit score is an important facet of our lives whether it is used to buy a house, for employment screening, purchasing insurance or a whole host of other activities that often require a good credit history.  For some consumers though, credit is a burden and they prefer to exercise their use of cash and avoid credit. 

Since there are so many actions that require a credit score such as renting a car, purchasing things over the phone or the Internet, and even writing a check having no credit and no credit score can be a burden.

For these consumers, improving their credit score is not the problem, it is simply a matter of obtaining credit in order to have a credit score.  If you have no credit history, you have no track record of payment and you most likely will not have a credit score.  The unfortunate aspect of having no credit history and no credit score is that consumer is considered a credit risk.

Lenders use credit scores to help them determine whether someone is an acceptable credit risk for new credit or whether a creditor will increase or decrease an existing line of credit or even the likelihood that a customer will file for bankruptcy.  Creditors are reviewing a credit profile to see a history of how that consumer handles debt.  The review of an individual’s credit history may involve reviewing total outstanding debts, minimum monthly payments, even account credit limits.  If there is no credit history and no credit score upon which to make a decision, a decision to extend credit is regarded as a risk by most lenders and creditors.

In fact, the automated underwriting approval systems developed by FNMA and FHLMC used for the vast majority of home loan approvals will not approve a loan request in which the borrower does not have a credit score.

There are some things you can do to improve your credit even when your financial situation has turned sour and there are ways to build a credit profile and credit score when there is no credit score to start with.  The first issue someone may have when there is no credit score compiled with their credit report, may be that there is a mistake on their credit report.

Credit scores are dependent on the credit reporting agency that the score is based on.  The three major credit reporting agencies in the US are Trans Union, Experian and Equifax.  Each one of these credit reporting agencies will have a different score for the same consumer since the data in each of the three different credit reporting agencies on which the score is based will generally have slightly different information. 

If a consumer finds they do not have a credit score it may be the result of the score being based on data from just one credit reporting agency.  It may be that credit histories for accounts paid on time are missing from this credit report or is only recorded in one or two credit reports.

For credit histories that are only in one of the credit reporting agencies files, ask the other agencies to add the data.  Send a copy of the statement and the credit report that includes all of the accounts if you can.

If it appears more than one credit report or all of the big three credit agencies are missing accounts that are paid on time, ask the credit reporting agency that these accounts be added to the report.  Send the credit bureaus a recent account statement and copies of canceled checks if needed, reflecting the account and payment history.  The credit bureau doesn’t have to add account information, but if it is a verifiable account they often will add the data.

A final step is to quickly develop a credit history.  A credit card is one of the fastest and easiest methods to build a credit history.  Credit cards can be obtained for consumers that have no credit and previous bad credit.  Some secure credit cards come with a guaranteed approval with just minimal conditions, none of which include credit verification.  It is important to use the credit card to obtain a payment history, though the payments can be made within the grace period to avoid finance charges.  A good resource to review competitive credit card offers is www.bestcreditcardrates.com.

Other loans such as secured loans at a bank, major department store credit cards even certain utility bills will work to establish a credit history as long as the bank or utility company reports the accounts to the credit bureaus.

Debt Collection News - Debt Collection Supervisors Settle FTC Charges

The Federal Trade Commission administer a wide variety of consumer protection laws, engages in law enforcement, and develops policy and research tools to prohibit unfair and deceptive acts or practices against consumers including actions that involve credit reporting agencies, credit repair services and debt collection activities.

The FTC produces press releases on action taken against businesses and individuals that fall under the jurisdiction of the FTC.

This is a recent press release on action taken by the FTC regarding unfair and deceptive practices regarding debt collections.

Concluding a case that drew the largest civil penalty ever imposed on a debt collection business, the Federal Trade Commission settled with the two remaining individual defendants who allegedly misled, threatened, and harassed consumers; disclosed their debts to third parties; and deposited postdated checks early, in violation of federal law.  The settlement order requires each of these senior managers to pay a civil penalty and bars them from future violations.

“The FTC wants to remind debt collectors of their responsibilities and obligations under the law.  Abusive collection actions are illegal, and if debt collectors use abusive tactics they could face legal action,” said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.  “At the same time, we want consumers to understand their rights if their debts go into collection.  Money matters, and the more people know about managing their debt and dealing with debt collectors, the better off they will be.”

According to the FTC’s complaint, filed by the Department of Justice on the FTC’s behalf, the defendants participated in, or controlled, the actions of debt collectors whose unlawful practices included false or deceptive threats of garnishment, arrest, and legal action; improper calls to consumers; frequent, harassing, threatening, and abusive calls; and unfair and unauthorized withdrawals from consumers’ bank accounts.  The complaint also alleged that the defendants failed to adequately investigate consumer complaints or discipline collectors, and collectors who were terminated for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) often were rehired within a few months.

In 2008, Academy Collection Service, Inc. and its owner, Keith Dickstein, paid $2.25 million to settle FTC charges that Academy collectors violated the FTC Act and the FDCPA while collecting debts, and that Dickstein failed to stop the violations.  The settlement order announced today, negotiated by DOJ and the FTC, imposed civil penalties of $375,000 and $300,000, respectively, on Albert S. Bastian and Edward Hurt, who oversaw Academy’s Las Vegas collection center.  The judgments were suspended upon payment of $7,500 each, based on their ability to pay.  The full judgments will become due immediately if the defendants are found to have misrepresented their financial condition.

The order bars Bastian and Hurt from making false, deceptive, or misleading representations in debt collection efforts, such as that nonpayment will result in garnishment of wages, seizure of property, or lawsuits, or that they or their agents are attorneys.  They also are prohibited from withdrawing money from consumers’ bank accounts without their express informed consent, and from depositing or threatening to deposit postdated checks before the date on the check.  In addition, the pair are barred from improperly communicating with third parties about a debt; communicating with a consumer at any unusual time or place; and harassing, oppressing, or abusing any person in connection with debt collection.

The Commission vote to authorize DOJ to file the consent decree was 4-0.  The consent decree was entered in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.  This consent decree is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by these defendants of a law violation.  A consent decree is subject to court approval and has the force of law when signed by a judge.

Next Page »

website programming by Derek J Entringer | interactive media developer and web application developer